The Old Testament in the Heart of the Catholic
Church
< > All Chapters
{921} Down
It may surprise you to learn, as you study things about the Old Testament
in this text, that you will actually be required to read from the Old
Testament as you study. Before going on, please read the entire third
chapter of the book of Genesis. Genesis is the first book in the Bible.
Read Chapter 3 (Gen 3) - Yes, now - then answer the following
question:
A dispute breaks out in that Bible-studying club with the rule that:
''If a scholar relies on the judgments of the Holy Father and bishops
united with him to help him find out what the Bible means, then he is out
of the club.''
Some people in the club say that Adam and Eve is just a story. Adam and
Eve never really existed. Thus, their Fall did not actually happen, but is
only a metaphor for the existence of evil, and for man's weakness and
proneness to sin. Others say that Adam and Eve were real and that they
actually Fell.
You say, ''Well, I am very glad that you are so polite when you argue in
your club, but we actually know what this answer is. In [CCC 390], for
example, the Holy Father and bishops in communion with him clearly tell us
that, although Genesis 3 is expressed in the language of a story, that
story 'affirms a primeval event, a deed that took place at the beginning
of the history of man.'''
''So, we already know the Bible's meaning here. The Fall was real. The
Holy Father and bishops in communion with him, acting in the person of
Christ and under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, determined this truth
in order to give us what we need to study the truth of the Bible. Thus we
already know that moving toward the idea that the Fall was only a story or
a metaphor will take us farther from Christ.'' After you say this, you
are
a. applauded by the club.
b. out of the club.
c. welcomed in the club.
Down
{922} Down Up
The club members give you a reason for their decision about you in the
previous question. They say:
a. ''You are being professional in the way
that you made your decision about what the Bible means.''
b. ''You are helping us resolve this
dispute in the way that you made your decision about what the Bible
means.''
c. ''You are not being professional in the
way that you made your decision about what the Bible means.''
Down Up
{923} Down Up
This Bible-studying club with that particular rule is very real, and many
Catholics who study the Bible for a living, including priests and nuns,
belong to it. It's not really a club, of course, and there's not just one
club. There are, however, many modern ''professional organizations'' of
biblical scholars. Most of them, including the Catholic ones, in effect
have made the rule that, if you rely on the judgments of the Holy Father
and bishops united with him to help you find out what the Bible means,
then that is an ''unprofessional'' thing to do.
So, for example, many of the people in these clubs plainly teach that the
Fall is just a story, a metaphor, and nothing more. Why would even the
Catholics, even the priests and nuns, in these grown-up Bible-studying
clubs, be doing highly dangerous things, such as moving toward ideas that
the Holy Father and the bishops in communion with him clearly say will
move them farther from Christ?
It's complicated, but basically, those Bible scholars just don't think
that the sacraments are real in the way that the Church professes. Even
the Church admits that the Holy Father and the bishops in communion with
him are not necessarily any holier or smarter than anyone else. If the
sacraments are not real in the way that the Church professes, then even
the Church admits that there would be no particular reason to listen to
her teachings.
So, not understanding that the sacraments are real, the Bible scholars in
these clubs, even the Catholics, do not find any logical reason to listen
to the Church's teachings about what the Bible means. They are not at all
nervous about what they're doing.
To the contrary, they usually think that they are doing a better job of
finding out what the Bible means than the Holy Father and bishops in
communion with him.
After all, these scholars are ''professionals.'' They are so learned that
they actually get paid, by fine universities, to study the Bible. Many of
these scholars probably are smarter than an average bishop. So, why
shouldn't they trust their own judgments instead of a bishop's? Why,
indeed? You know the answer: because the sacraments are real. Christ is
trying to help us stay close to him.
We can pray that eventually, these Bible scholars will stop being members
of those clubs. <<
Down Up
{924} Down Up
The most accurate way to read the Old Testament is to read it
a. as if the sacraments were not real and
the New Testament were not true.
b. knowing that the sacraments are real and
the New Testament is true.
c. not knowing whether the sacraments are
real or the New Testament is true.
Down Up
{925} Down Up
According to many professional Bible scholars today, the LEAST accurate
way to read the Old Testament is to read it
a. as if the sacraments were not real and
the New Testament were not true.
b. knowing that the sacraments are real and
the New Testament is true.
c. not knowing whether the sacraments are
real or the New Testament is true.
Down Up
{926} Down Up
Many people now study the Bible for a living. Some do not even believe in
God. Many are not Catholic. You now also know that some Catholics who
study the Bible for a living do not study the Bible as if only the Holy
Father and bishops in communion with him can make definitive judgments
about the true meaning of the Bible. These same Catholic scholars might
even be highly offended and think that it would be would be ''infringing''
on their ''rights'' as scholars, if the Holy Father and bishops in
communion with him ever tried to tell them that one of their ideas about
the Bible will move men farther from Christ.
Let's take the very worst case. Let's say a person who does not believe
in God at all and in fact absolutely hates all believers, and who hates
Catholics in particular, studies the Bible for a living and publishes a
new ''discovery'' about the Bible in a scholarly journal. What should your
attitude be toward his ''discovery''?
a. It has to be incorrect, because he hates
Catholics and does not believe in God.
b. It might be correct, even though he
hates Catholics and does not believe in God.
c. We should ignore what he says even if it
may be correct, because of his unbelief.
Down Up
{927} Down Up
There's an old saying: ''Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.''
While we will definitely move farther from Christ if we move toward ideas
that Christ, through the sacrament of Holy Orders, has told us will take
us farther from him, there is no need to discredit or to dispute every
single thing a biblical scholar says just because he does not share our
faith, has weak faith, or has even rejected faith. God overcame death
itself. He can certainly work through men of a different faith, limited
faith, or even no faith at all. <<
Down Up
{928} Down Up
Apart from the sacraments of the Catholic Church, the meaning of the
Bible can only partially be known, because the meaning of the Bible is
a. a concept.
b. an idea.
c. Christ himself.
Down Up
{929} Down Up
The bishops and the Holy Father teach that Jesus Christ is the Word of
God in
a. absolutely every sense.
b. a purely symbolic sense.
c. an imperfect sense.
Down Up
{930} Down Up
The bishops and the Holy Father teach that Christ really is the Word of
God, in every sense: ''Through all the words of Sacred Scripture, God
speaks only one single Word.'' [CCC 102] Christ is that one Word. [CCC
65]
That is, Christ himself is the meaning of the Bible. The Word that God
speaks into the world is his Son.
When believers hear or read the Bible, they receive more than an idea or
a concept. They actually receive a Person, Christ himself: ''He is present
in his word since it is he himself who speaks when the holy Scriptures are
read in the Church.'' [CCC 1088]
Just before receiving the Most Holy Eucharist, we pray to Jesus, ''Lord,
I am not worthy to receive you, but only say the word and I shall be
healed.'' We profess that we are unable to receive what we most long for
and need, Jesus himself, without his direct help. Christ himself must
prepare us to receive him in the Eucharist.
Similarly, CCC 108 professes that, by the power of the Holy Spirit,
Christ himself prepares us to receive him in the Sacred Scriptures:
''... the Christian faith is not a 'religion of the book.' Christianity
is the religion of the 'Word' of God, 'not a written and mute word, but
the Word which is incarnate and living.' If the Scriptures are not to
remain a dead letter, Christ, the eternal Word of the living God, must,
through the Holy Spirit, 'open [our] minds to understand the
Scriptures.''' <<
Down Up
{931} Down Up
Human words can only be ''about'' something. For instance, a book on the
solar system
a. can literally be the solar system, and
not just human words ''about'' the solar system.
b. can not literally be the solar system,
but only human words ''about'' the solar system.
c. can partly be the solar system, and
partly can be human words ''about'' the solar system.
Down Up
{932} Down Up
The Bible was written by human authors who were inspired by the Holy
Spirit. Through those human authors, God himself speaks ''one single
Word'' - his only-begotten Son, Christ. [CCC 102] Thus, when a believer
reads the Bible, he receives
a. God's ''one single Word,'' Christ
himself.
b. words ''about'' God, but not God
himself.
c. words that remind us of God himself.
Down Up
{933} Down Up
The Bible is
a. just like any other book, because it is
merely our words ''about'' something.
b. not like any other book, because it is
really our words ''about'' God.
c. not like any other book, because it is
not merely our words ''about'' God.
Down Up
{934} Down Up
When a believer reads the Bible, he receives
a. God's ''one single Word.''
b. only concepts and ''ideas.''
c. words ''about'' God.
Down Up
{935} Down Up
The Christ you receive in fullness when you receive the Eucharist
a. is a reminder of Jesus Christ who died
on the Cross.
b. is the same Jesus Christ who died on the
Cross.
c. is not the same Jesus Christ who died on
the Cross.
Down Up
{936} Down Up
The Christ you receive in fullness when you receive the Eucharist
a. is a reminder of the Christ you receive
from hearing or reading the Bible.
b. is the same Christ you receive from
hearing or reading the Bible.
c. is not the same Christ you receive from
hearing or reading the Bible.
Down Up
{937} Down Up
The meaning of the Bible is
a. a concept.
b. an idea.
c. Christ himself.
Down Up
{938} Down Up
The Bible is like no other book. It is not merely human words ''about''
something - not even human words ''about'' God. There are many books, from
many religious traditions (including Catholic books), that are human words
''about'' God. Many of these have some value. Some of them, written by
great Catholic saints, have great value, and can genuinely help us move
closer to Christ. These spiritual and theological books have been publicly
praised by popes and bishops, and read for hundreds of years both by other
great saints and by ordinary sinners. The bishops even quote from many of
these writings of the saints in the Catechism itself.
But nothing else ever written is, or can ever be, the Bible.
Among all religious or spiritual books ever written or ever to be
written, only the Bible literally is God's Word - Christ himself.
This is why at Mass the Church does not read a single word from the
writings of even the most holy and learned saints - but only the
Bible.
At Mass, we receive the whole Christ, the bread of life, ''taken from the
one table of God's Word and Christ's Body.'' [CCC 103] One table, one
Word, one Body - one crucified and risen Lord. <<
Down Up
{939} Down Up
Who gets to have an opinion about the meaning of a particular passage in
the Bible?
a. Anybody.
b. Only people who study the Bible for a
living.
c. Only the Pope and bishops in union with
him.
Down Up
{940} Up
Sometimes a certain passage in the Bible may be particularly moving to
you when you read or hear it. That is the opposite of a bad idea. In fact,
that's great! Just try to make sure that the meaning you find there does
not contradict a meaning already known to the Church. The meaning you
found in that passage could add something personal to you, etc., but it
must not contradict the meanings which the Church knows are revealed in
the passage, or you will be moving farther from Christ, however
''sincere'' your feeling about the passage is.
For example, if you read Gen 3, and its special meaning for you depended
on it being just a metaphor, a story, and nothing more, then, obviously,
you would be on the wrong track. <<
Up < > All Chapters
copyright (c) 2001 John
Kelleher. All rights reserved.
www.catholiclearning.com