The Old Testament in the Heart of the Catholic
Church
< > All Chapters
{1781} Down
In 1 Sam 16:11-13, David's anointing
a. caused a great earthquake in the
land.
b. caused the Spirit of the Lord to be upon
him.
c. enabled him to defeat his brothers in
battle.
Down
{1782} Down Up
The anointed ones are anointed in and by
a. the kingdom of David.
b. the Law and the Prophets.
c. the Spirit of the Lord.
Down Up
{1783} Down Up
Read Is 61:1-3. Those who have the Spirit of the Lord come upon them are
often said to be
a. anointed.
b. blessed.
c. cursed.
Down Up
{1784} Down Up
Read Jeremiah, Jer 23:5-6. This prophecy, along with Isa 11, fueled the
hopes of the people of Israel for
a. a messiah who would save Israel.
b. a victorious general of the army.
c. the return of King David.
Down Up
{1785} Down Up
The messiah that the people of Israel gradually learned to hope for would
be anointed by the Spirit of the Lord.
a. Maybe.
b. No.
c. Yes.
Down Up
{1786} Down Up
The ''Servant Songs'' are passages from the book of Isaiah in which ''The
Messiah's characteristics are revealed above all.'' [CCC 713] They
proclaim that the Messiah's identity is linked with the triumph of the
Cross, not with earthly glories, and that it is through the Cross of Jesus
that the Spirit will be poured out to all men. Read Isa 42:1-9. In this
Servant Song it is plain that the servant who is to come
a. is the Messiah.
b. will fail in his mission.
c. will suffer and die.
Down Up
{1787} Down Up
Recall that the Messiah is the one upon whom God puts his Spirit. That is
what makes him the Messiah, the anointed one of God. <<
Down Up
{1788} Down Up
Read Isa 49:1-6. The Messiah is to be a light
a. to Israel alone.
b. to the nations.
c. to the nations alone.
Down Up
{1789} Down Up
Read Isa 50:4-10. In this Servant Song the Catholic Church sees it
foretold that the Messiah
a. will be a king.
b. will not suffer.
c. will suffer.
Down Up
{1790} Down Up
Read Isa 52:13-53:12. The Catholic Church sees in this passage the
revelation of the Passion and Death of Jesus, the Messiah. This passage is
read every year at the liturgy of Good Friday. <<
Down Up
{1791} Down Up
Read Isa 61:1-2. Who first said that the life and mission of Jesus is the
fulfillment of the meaning of this passage?
a. Jesus.
b. St. Augustine.
c. St. Paul.
Down Up
{1792} Down Up
(Now read Luke 4:16-21). <<
Down Up
{1793} Down Up
That Jesus is the Messiah, the fulfillment of God's promise to
Israel,
a. is something all Jews should have seen
immediately.
b. is something that anyone would find
reasonable.
c. was not something that Israel could
reasonably have expected.
Down Up
{1794} Down Up
Making the claim that Jesus is the Messiah, the fulfillment of God's
promise to Israel, and therefore that the Old Testament has more than its
literal meaning and should be read in the light of the New
a. is arrogant, unreasonable, and
blasphemous.
b. is a totalitarian privileging of
meaning.
c. would be a sin, if Jesus were not
God.
Down Up
{1795} Down Up
Jesus is the Messiah, the fulfillment of the promises made to Israel. The
Catechism itself calls this ''surprising'' [CCC 591] and calls this
intervention of God in history ''unprecedented'' [CCC 579]. That is, the
children of Israel could not have come to this knowledge about the true
nature of the Messiah on their own. On their own, they could never have
imagined that God would speak his Word in the way he actually did.
Also, as is fully proper, no mere man, but only God himself, can say what
his promises to Israel truly mean.
Thus it is correct and fully in accord with reason to see the New
Testament hidden in the Old, to see the meaning of the Messianic promises
not violated but fulfilled in Jesus.
However, this is correct and reasonable only if Jesus is God made man.
Then and only then is it God himself who says what his promises to Israel
truly mean. >>
Down Up
{1796} Down Up
Who are you, to tell God what his Word means? If Jesus is not God made
man, if the sacraments are not real and the New Testament is not true,
then no academic argument in the world can ever justify what the Catholic
Church has always done. Indeed, Jesus himself can not justify his use of
the Old Testament unless he truly is the Word of God. [compare CCC
581]
Please get this straight: the whole issue of whether it is proper and
reasonable to read the Old Testament as if the sacraments were real and
the New Testament were true, is NOT finally an academic argument. All an
academic argument can discover is that doing such a thing is proper and
reasonable ONLY if Jesus is exactly who the Catholic Church professes him
to be.
Reading the Old Testament in the light of the New is a surprise, a
meaning God himself, and God alone, gives to the Old Testament. The
Catholic Church would NEVER have read the Old Testament in the light of
the New, if she did not believe her Lord, who taught her to do just
that.
If you want to draw close to Jesus by drawing close to his Catholic
Church, then you too must learn to read the Old Testament as she does in
her heart.
Just so you're clear: the Catholic Church reads the Old Testament in the
light of the New Testament because Jesus is the Lord. There is absolutely
no other good reason - academic or otherwise - to read the Old Testament
in the light of the New. Only God himself could reveal to us that this is
what his Word means. <<
Down Up
{1797} Down Up
Why do you think Marcion's idea, that the Old Testament is not part of
the ''real'' Bible, did not prevail?
a. It was just an accident that Marcion
lost - it could have gone either way, depending on who had more power.
b. Marcion was just not very smart or
persuasive, so very few people thought his ideas were more true and more
reasonable.
c. The Holy Spirit, working in and through
the bishops and Pope of the Catholic Church, protected the true meaning of
the Bible.
Down Up
{1798} Down Up
Wait a minute. Marcion was a Christian. He was baptized. So were many of
the people who accepted his ideas. That means that Marcion's ideas were
held, not by people who ''wanted to bring down the Church,'' but by people
who claimed that Marcion's ideas should be accepted because they were more
true to the ''real'' Catholic faith. So - really - why did Marcion's ideas
not prevail?
a. It was just an accident that Marcion
lost - it could have gone either way, depending on who had more power.
b. Marcion was just not very smart or
persuasive, so very few people thought his ideas were more true and more
reasonable.
c. The Holy Spirit, working in and through
the bishops and Pope of the Catholic Church, protected the true meaning of
the Bible.
Down Up
{1799} Down Up
Here are two facts: a) Marcion's popularity shows that hundreds, even
thousands, of baptized Catholics can consider scary heresies to be more
true and more reasonable than the Catholic faith. b) A Catholic bishop,
along with dozens (yes, dozens) of Catholic priests and Catholic
theologians, decided that St. Joan of Arc was a heretic and should be
burned at the stake.
Here is a conclusion from those facts: being Catholic, being a
theologian, or even being a bishop, does not seem to protect you from
terrible errors.
Here is the question for you: So - really - why did Marcion's ideas not
prevail?
a. It was just an accident that Marcion
lost - it could have gone either way, depending on who had more power.
b. Marcion was just not very smart or
persuasive, so very few people thought his idea was more true and more
reasonable.
c. The Holy Spirit, working in and through
the bishops and Pope of the Catholic Church, protected the true meaning of
the Bible.
Down Up
{1800} Up
Throughout history, people have disagreed about what the Bible means.
Very smart people have disagreed with other very smart people. Christians
have disagreed with other Christians. Sometimes, it matters a lot who is
right. For example, if Marcion's ideas had been followed, then (among
other things) Christians would have thrown the Old Testament out of the
Bible. But how can we tell who is right? For instance, how can we really
be certain that Marcion was wrong?
a. Due to the fact that all truly
intelligent people agree about what the Bible means, we know that a
committee of very smart people with university degrees will find the true
meaning of the Bible every time.
b. Even though history shows that we do not
necessarily find the true meaning of the Bible on our own, Christ himself
continues to give man what he needs to study the truth of the Bible
through the sacrament of Holy Orders.
c. Since people have been disagreeing about
what the Bible means for thousands of years, we can't ever really be
certain who is right when people disagree about the true meaning of the
Bible.
Up < > All Chapters
copyright (c) 2001 John
Kelleher. All rights reserved.
www.catholiclearning.com